As a marketer, I'm a bit torn. In helping clients grow, I tell many of them that marketing is an ongoing experiment in which we listen to the data and let it guide us. It's the most rational thing to do. And that's, at least at some level, what I think Facebook was trying to do.
Whether it's through Google or HubSpot or Signals, we are ultimately trying to attract prospects and leads that will be optimal customers for our clients. We're not trying to bug people or interrupt people and that's, in my humble opinion, the great appeal of inbound marketing. We're simply trying to draw them in based on the problem or issues they are looking to solve. And we're not trying to publish our results in Psychology Today, either. We make a point to make sure the information provided to our clients is kept private and not shared or sold.
The reality is that once you bounce onto the great wide Internet you're defaulted into one big, messy, slobbering, technocrazy experiment. Your cookies are tracked, you're remarketed to, you're A/B tested on, you're popped up on, and you are one of many unwilling subjects. Or unknowing subjects. The folks 'experimenting' on you will simply and genuinely say they seek to personalize your web experience. Why would Amazon want to show you knives if you are looking for watches?
I'm not sure. Get off the grid if you think this stuff is truly creepy. Delete your Facebook account. After all, Mark thinks you're dumb.
But, at least in the B2B space, realize that the actions and strategies of benevolent marketers like the LyntonWeb folks (and many, many others) are designed to grow companies and connect them with the right customers. And that's definitely a good thing.